Skip to content

Home / Facility Planning / Forklift Fleet Sizing

Forklift Fleet Sizing Calculator (Forklift / AGV)

Work out how many forklifts or automated guided vehicles a shift really needs from the work in front of them, not from a rule of thumb. Enter the moves per shift, the cycle time of one full round trip, the shift length, a realistic utilization, and a spare-capacity margin, and the tool returns the base fleet, the theoretical fleet, fleet utilization, moves per hour per truck, required and delivered throughput, and the tonnage handled. Free, no sign-up, and your numbers stay in your browser.

In short: fleet size comes from dividing the work by the capacity of one truck. Multiply moves by cycle time to get the truck-minutes of work, divide by the productive minutes one truck offers in a shift, and round up. That base fleet covers the demand; a spare margin of about 15 to 20 percent on top covers charging, maintenance, and breakdowns. Size from your own move count and measured cycle time, and the number stops being a guess.

Fleet inputs

Recommended fleet

13 trucksbase plus spare capacity

Base fleet (rounded up)
11
Theoretical fleet
10.94
Fleet utilization
99.4%
Moves per hour per truck
16.0
Required moves per hour
175.0 moves/h
Fleet capacity (moves per hour)
176.0 moves/h
Tonnage moved per shift
1,120.0 t

Plan for 13 trucks: 11 to cover the work plus 15% spare for charging, maintenance, and breakdowns.

What the calculator computes

Enter five things about a shift: the number of loads the fleet must move, the cycle time of one complete move, the length of the shift, a utilization figure for how much of that time a truck actually works, and a spare-capacity margin. The tool turns those into a fleet size. It multiplies moves by cycle time to find the total truck-minutes of work, divides by the productive minutes one truck offers, and rounds up to whole trucks. That is the base fleet, the number needed to cover the demand. It then adds the spare margin to give a recommended fleet you can actually run.

Around that headline it reports the figures a planner checks before trusting the answer. The theoretical fleet is the raw division before rounding, so you see how close you sit to the next whole truck. Fleet utilization shows how hard the rounded fleet works. Moves per hour per truck and the required moves per hour confirm the fleet keeps up with the flow, and the tonnage line converts the move count into weight handled. Every number stays in the browser.

Why you size from the work, not a rule of thumb

Ask around a warehouse and you will hear fleet targets set by habit: one truck per dock door, one per thousand pallet positions, or simply the number the site has always run. These shortcuts ignore the two things that actually set fleet size, how many moves the operation makes and how long each move takes. Two warehouses with the same footprint can need very different fleets if one runs long hauls to a far mezzanine and the other shuttles pallets a few meters from receiving to a pick face.

Sizing from the work replaces the guess with arithmetic anyone can audit. You count the moves a shift has to make, time the round trip honestly, and decide how much spare you want. The result is a number you can defend in a budget meeting, because every input is visible and every step is a division you can check. A rule of thumb hides its assumptions; a work-based calculation puts them on the table, which is what you want when each truck is a lease and an operator.

The core formula

The fleet size is one division, rounded up. Take the moves the shift must make, multiply by the cycle time in minutes to get the truck-minutes of work, then divide by the productive minutes one truck offers, which is the shift hours times sixty times the utilization. In symbols, N = ceil( moves x cycle time / (shift hours x 60 x utilization) ). The round up to the next whole number matters because you cannot lease a fraction of a truck, and rounding down would leave the last slice of work uncovered.

The recommended fleet adds a spare margin on top: recommended = ceil( theoretical x (1 + spare) ), where the spare percentage covers charging, planned maintenance, and the truck that breaks down mid-shift. Both steps use the same theoretical fleet, the raw unrounded division, so the two outputs stay consistent. The whole method is one formula applied twice, once for the work and once for resilience, which is why the same math sizes a four-truck cross-dock and a forty-truck distribution center.

Cycle time and what it includes

Cycle time is the length of one full move, measured from the moment a truck starts toward a load to the moment it is free to start the next one. It is the single input planners get wrong most often, because it is tempting to time only the lift and forget the rest. A real cycle has four parts: travel to the load, pick it up, travel to the drop point, set it down, and return empty toward the next job. Every one of those seconds counts, because the truck cannot do anything else until the round trip closes.

The honest way to get cycle time is to stand on the floor and time a sample of complete moves during a busy period, not a quiet one. Include the queueing at a congested dock, the wait for a trailer, and the reversing and lining up that never show in a tidy time study. If you shave those away to make the number look good, the fleet you buy will fall short, because the demand does not care about the optimistic cycle time.

Utilization and the planning range

Utilization is the share of paid time a truck spends actually moving loads. It is never one hundred percent. Operators take breaks, trucks wait for work, congestion slows travel, and shift changes eat minutes at both ends. A useful planning range is 60 to 80 percent: a busy single-shift operation with steady flow might sustain 70 to 80 percent, while a site with lumpy demand, long distances, or heavy congestion sits nearer 60. Push the assumed number above 85 percent and you are planning for a truck that never pauses, which no real operation delivers.

Utilization enters the formula as the multiplier on available time, so it has a strong effect on the answer. A truck at 80 percent gives 384 productive minutes in an eight-hour shift; the same truck at 60 percent gives only 288, so the same work needs more trucks. Because the effect is large, it is worth measuring rather than assuming: pull the telematics or hours logs and compare productive hours to paid hours across a few weeks.

The base fleet and fleet utilization

The base fleet is the theoretical fleet rounded up to whole trucks. It is the smallest number that covers the shift’s work at the utilization you assumed, with no allowance for anything going wrong. In the default case the theoretical fleet is 10.94 and the base is 11. That rounding up is not padding, it is arithmetic honesty: 10.94 trucks cannot exist, and ten trucks would leave almost a full truck of work undone, so the operation would fall behind by the end of the shift.

Fleet utilization compares the theoretical fleet to the rounded base, and tells you how hard the base fleet has to work. In the default case it is 10.94 divided by 11, or 99.4 percent, which is very high: the base fleet is running almost flat out. A high fleet utilization warns that the base fleet alone is fragile, because it leaves no room for a slow day or a truck out of service. That is why the method does not stop at the base and adds spare capacity next.

Spare capacity and the recommended fleet

A base fleet that runs at 99 percent utilization has no cushion. The first battery swap, the first flat tire, the first truck pulled for its service interval, and the operation falls behind. Spare capacity is the margin that keeps the line running when that happens. It is a percentage added on top of the theoretical fleet, usually about 15 to 20 percent, chosen to cover the charging windows, the planned maintenance, and the unplanned breakdowns that take trucks out of the pool during a shift.

In the default case the recommended fleet is the round up of 10.94 times 1.15, which is 12.58, rounded to 13 trucks. The two units above the base of 11 are the spare: when one truck is on charge and another is in the shop, 11 are still available to cover the work. Electric fleets that need midshift charging, or sites far from a service van, lean toward 20 percent; a lightly loaded operation with fast swap batteries and a spare truck next door can sit nearer 15.

Moves per hour per truck and fleet throughput

The fleet-size division is one way to reach the answer; the throughput check is the other, and a planner should confirm both agree. Moves per hour per truck is the productive moves one truck completes in an hour: sixty divided by the cycle time, times the utilization. At a 3-minute cycle and 80 percent utilization that is 60 divided by 3, times 0.80, which is 16.0 moves per hour. This is the honest hourly rate of one truck, already discounted for the time it does not spend moving.

The required moves per hour is simply the shift’s moves divided by the shift hours, 1,400 over 8, or 175.0 moves per hour. The fleet capacity is the base fleet times the per-truck rate, 11 times 16, or 176.0 moves per hour. Because 176.0 is just above the 175.0 required, the base fleet of 11 holds on throughput as well as on the division, and the two methods agree. If the fleet capacity had come out below the required rate, it would be a signal that rounding left the fleet a hair short and the base needed another truck.

Tonnage moved per shift

The move count answers how many loads, and the load per move turns that into how much weight. Multiply the moves per shift by the load carried on each one, and you have the tonnage the fleet handles in a shift. In the default case, 1,400 moves at 800 kg each is 1,120,000 kg, which is 1,120.0 t per shift. The load field is optional, so if you leave it blank the fleet size is unaffected and only the tonnage line drops out.

Tonnage is a useful sanity check. If the warehouse ships a known weight per day, the tonnage the fleet handles should line up, and a large gap points to a miscounted move figure. It also feeds capacity planning upstream and downstream, since docks, racking, and staging all size to weight as well as to pallet count. Tonnage does not change the fleet math, but it keeps the move count anchored to physical reality.

Forklifts versus AGVs

Automated guided vehicles size with exactly the same formula as forklifts, because the arithmetic cares about moves, cycle time, and available time, not about whether a person is driving. What changes between the two is the value of the inputs. An AGV usually travels a fixed guided path at a steady, conservative speed, so its cycle time is often longer than a skilled operator’s on the same route, but it is far more consistent from move to move, with none of the variation a human shift brings.

Utilization also shifts. An AGV can run through breaks and across shift changes, which lifts the share of the day it works, but it stops for charging on a fixed schedule and cannot improvise around a blocked aisle. To size an AGV fleet, change the cycle time and the utilization to match the vehicle and leave the formula alone. The method is vehicle-neutral, so a mixed study of manned trucks and automated units runs on the same two inputs adjusted per type.

Reading the results panel

The headline is the recommended fleet, the number to plan and budget for, with the base and the spare rolled together. Directly beneath, the base fleet shows the trucks needed to cover the work alone, and the theoretical fleet shows the raw division before rounding, so you can see whether you sit just over a whole truck, as 10.94 does, or comfortably clear of the next one. That distance to the next integer tells you how sensitive the fleet is to a small change in demand or cycle time.

Fleet utilization flags how hard the base fleet works, with a high figure warning that the base has little slack of its own. The moves-per-hour trio, per truck, required, and delivered, is the throughput cross-check: as long as fleet capacity meets or beats the required rate, the fleet keeps up. Read together, the panel confirms the fleet both divides out correctly and clears the hourly demand, the two tests a fleet has to pass.

The limits of the method

This calculator sizes from average demand and a single cycle time, and that simplicity is both its strength and its boundary. It does not model the peak-hour profile, so a fleet sized to the shift average can still fall behind during the busiest hour when trucks and docks jam up. It does not model congestion and interference between trucks sharing narrow aisles, which lengthens real cycle times as the fleet grows. And it treats every move as the same job, so it does not separate putaway from picking or account for dual-cycle trips that combine both.

Because of those limits, the output is a strong planning estimate, not a final commitment. Validate the peak hours and the travel distances before you sign a lease, and for a large fleet run a simulation that captures queueing and aisle contention, since those effects grow faster than a linear model predicts. A fleet size is only as good as the demand data behind it.

Where this calculator fits

It suits anyone deciding how many material-handling vehicles a shift needs: warehouse and distribution managers planning a new site or a peak season, industrial engineers building a labor and equipment model, procurement teams sizing a lease, and students working a fleet-sizing assignment. The inputs are the numbers those roles already track, so the tool turns figures you have into a fleet you can defend.

It also fits early automation studies, where the same formula compares a manned fleet against an AGV fleet by swapping two inputs. The chart shows the theoretical, base, and recommended fleets side by side, so the jump from raw math to a runnable fleet is visible, not just tabulated.

Common mistakes to avoid

The first mistake is timing an optimistic cycle time, clocking only the lift and travel and dropping the queueing, the battery swaps, and the lining up at the dock. An undersized cycle time undersizes the fleet, and the shortfall shows up as backed-up docks, not as a spreadsheet error. The second is assuming a utilization no real truck sustains, penciling in 90 or 95 percent because the trucks look busy, when measured productive time rarely clears 80 percent on a single shift.

The third is sizing to the daily average and ignoring the peak hour, which leaves the fleet fine on paper and behind at ten in the morning. The fourth is skipping the spare margin and discovering the first breakdown stops the line. The fifth is rounding the theoretical fleet down to save a truck, which leaves a slice of work uncovered every shift. Measure the cycle honestly, use a real utilization, size to the peak, hold spare capacity, and always round up, and the fleet you buy matches the work it faces.

Five worked examples

Each example uses one common setup so the numbers build on each other: 1,400 moves per shift, a 3-minute cycle time, an 8-hour shift, 80 percent utilization, 15 percent spare, and 800 kg per move.

Example 1: the base fleet

Start with the work. The shift makes 1,400 moves, and each move takes 3 minutes, so the work needed is 1,400 times 3, which is 4,200 truck-minutes. Now find what one truck offers: 8 hours times 60 minutes is 480 minutes of paid time, and at 80 percent utilization that is 480 times 0.80, or 384 productive minutes per truck. Divide the work by the capacity, 4,200 divided by 384, and the theoretical fleet is 10.94 trucks. You cannot run 0.94 of a truck, so round up to a base of 11 trucks. That base covers the shift’s work at the assumed utilization, with nothing held back for charging or breakdowns yet.

Example 2: the throughput check

Confirm the base fleet a second way, through the hourly rate. One truck at a 3-minute cycle completes 60 divided by 3, or 20 moves an hour if it never paused; at 80 percent utilization that is 20 times 0.80, which is 16 moves per hour per truck. The operation needs 1,400 moves spread over 8 hours, which is 1,400 divided by 8, or 175.0 moves per hour. Eleven trucks deliver 11 times 16, which is 176.0 moves per hour, just above the 175.0 required. Because the delivered rate clears the required rate, the base fleet of 11 holds on throughput as well as on the division, and the two methods agree.

Example 3: spare capacity

The base of 11 runs at 99.4 percent fleet utilization, almost flat out, so it needs a cushion. Add 15 percent for charging, maintenance, and breakdowns, applied to the theoretical fleet: the recommended fleet is the round up of 10.94 times 1.15, which is 12.58, rounded to 13 trucks. The two units above the base are the spare. When one truck is on charge and a second is in the shop, 11 are still available, which is exactly the number the work needs, so the line keeps running through the outage instead of backing up while a truck is down.

Example 4: cycle time sensitivity

Now change one input to see how much cycle time matters. Suppose longer travel to a far mezzanine pushes the cycle time to 4 minutes. Each truck now completes only 60 divided by 4, times 0.80, which is 12 moves per hour instead of 16. The work rises with the cycle time: the theoretical fleet becomes 4,200 times four-thirds, divided by 384, which is 14.58, so the base jumps to 15 trucks. A single extra minute of cycle time added four trucks to the base fleet. Distance, through its effect on cycle time, is the biggest single lever on fleet size, which is why measuring travel honestly matters more than any other input.

Example 5: utilization and tonnage

Change utilization instead. Drop it from 80 to 60 percent, the low end of the planning range, and the available time per truck falls from 384 to 288 productive minutes, because 480 times 0.60 is 288. The same 4,200 truck-minutes of work now needs 4,200 divided by 288, which is 14.58, so the base climbs to 15 trucks. A twenty-point drop in utilization added four trucks, the same swing as the longer cycle time, which shows how strongly both inputs drive the answer. Separately, the tonnage is independent of these levers: at 800 kg per move the fleet moves 1,400 times 800, which is 1,120,000 kg, or 1,120.0 t per shift.

Three expert tips

Size to the peak hour, not the daily average

A fleet sized to the shift average will look right on paper and fall behind at the busiest hour. Demand almost never arrives evenly: trailers cluster at the start of a shift, a wave of orders lands before a cutoff, and the moves per hour at ten in the morning can run half again above the daily mean. A fleet that just covers the average has no way to absorb that spike, so the docks back up, trailers wait, and the shift never recovers the lost time. Pull the move count for your busiest hour, size the fleet to that rate, and treat the average as a floor rather than the target. It costs a truck or two, and it buys a line that keeps flowing when the work bunches.

Measure cycle time honestly on the floor

Cycle time drives every number the tool produces, so an optimistic figure poisons the whole result. The temptation is to time a clean move, the lift, the short travel, the drop, and call that the cycle, but the real round trip includes the queue at a congested dock, the wait for a trailer to spot, the battery swap, and the reversing and lining up that never make it into a tidy study. Stand on the floor during a busy period and time a sample of complete moves, start to next start, and use the honest average. If you shave the cycle time to make the fleet look cheaper, the demand collects the difference anyway, as trucks that cannot keep up. The full round trip is what you are sizing against.

Keep utilization realistic and hold spare capacity

Two habits protect the fleet from being sized too lean. First, use a utilization a real truck sustains: a single-shift operation rarely holds above 60 to 70 percent productive time once breaks, waiting, congestion, and shift changes are counted, so a planning figure near that range is safer than an aspirational 90. Second, never buy exactly the base fleet. A fleet run flat out has no room for a charging window, a service interval, or the truck that fails mid-shift, and the first of those stops the line. Hold 15 to 20 percent spare on top of the theoretical fleet, more for electric trucks that need midshift charging or sites far from a service van, and the operation keeps moving when a truck drops out.

Frequently asked questions

How do you calculate the number of forklifts needed?

Divide the work by the capacity of one truck and round up. Multiply the moves a shift must make by the cycle time of one move to get the total truck-minutes of work, then divide by the productive minutes one truck offers, which is the shift hours times 60 times the utilization. Round the result up to whole trucks for the base fleet, then add a spare margin of about 15 to 20 percent for charging, maintenance, and breakdowns to get the recommended fleet. In the default case, 1,400 moves at 3 minutes is 4,200 truck-minutes, one truck offers 384 productive minutes at 80 percent utilization, so the theoretical fleet is 10.94, the base is 11, and the recommended fleet is 13 trucks.

What is the formula for forklift fleet sizing?

The fleet size is N = ceil( moves per shift x cycle time / (shift hours x 60 x utilization) ). The numerator is the truck-minutes of work, and the denominator is the productive minutes one truck offers in the shift, so the division is work divided by capacity, rounded up because you cannot run a fraction of a truck. The recommended fleet adds a spare margin: recommended = ceil( theoretical x (1 + spare) ), where the spare percentage covers charging, maintenance, and breakdowns. In the default case the theoretical fleet is 4,200 divided by 384, which is 10.94, the base fleet is 11, and with 15 percent spare the recommended fleet is 13 trucks.

What is cycle time in fleet sizing?

Cycle time is the length of one complete move, from the moment a truck starts toward a load to the moment it is free to start the next one. It includes travel to the load, the pick up, travel to the drop point, setting the load down, and the return toward the next job. An honest cycle time also captures the queueing at a congested dock, the wait for a trailer, the battery swap, and the reversing and lining up that a tidy time study leaves out. Because cycle time multiplies the move count to set the work, an optimistic figure undersizes the fleet, so it should be measured on the floor during a busy period rather than estimated from a clean move.

What does utilization mean and what is a typical range?

Utilization is the share of paid time a truck spends actually moving loads, after breaks, waiting for work, congestion, and shift changes are removed. It is never 100 percent. A useful planning range is 60 to 80 percent: a busy single-shift operation with steady flow might sustain 70 to 80 percent, while a site with lumpy demand, long travel, or heavy congestion sits nearer 60. Assuming a figure above 85 percent plans for a truck that never pauses, which no real operation delivers. Because utilization multiplies available time, it has a strong effect on the answer, so it is worth measuring from telematics or hours logs rather than assuming. At 80 percent a truck offers 384 productive minutes in an eight-hour shift; at 60 percent only 288.

Why do you round the fleet up?

Because you cannot lease or run a fraction of a truck, and rounding down would leave part of the work uncovered every shift. The theoretical fleet is the raw division of work by capacity, and it almost always lands between two whole numbers. In the default case it is 10.94 trucks. Rounding down to 10 would leave nearly a full truck of work undone, so the operation would fall behind by the end of the shift and back up the docks. Rounding up to 11 covers the work. The round up is not padding, it is arithmetic honesty: the base fleet is the smallest whole number of trucks that actually covers the demand at the assumed utilization.

What is spare capacity and how much should you add?

Spare capacity is a margin added on top of the theoretical fleet to keep the line running when trucks drop out for charging, planned maintenance, or an unplanned breakdown. A base fleet that runs near full utilization has no cushion, so the first battery swap or flat tire puts it behind. The usual margin is about 15 to 20 percent. In the default case the recommended fleet is the round up of 10.94 times 1.15, which is 12.58, rounded to 13 trucks, giving two spare units above the base of 11. Electric fleets that need midshift charging or sites far from a service van lean toward 20 percent; a lightly loaded operation with fast swap batteries and a spare truck nearby can sit nearer 15.

How many moves per hour can one truck do?

Moves per hour per truck is 60 divided by the cycle time, times the utilization. At a 3-minute cycle a truck could complete 60 divided by 3, or 20 moves an hour if it never paused, but at 80 percent utilization the honest rate is 20 times 0.80, which is 16.0 moves per hour. That already discounts the time the truck does not spend moving. The figure is the basis of the throughput cross-check: multiply it by the base fleet to get the delivered moves per hour, and compare that to the required rate, which is the shift’s moves divided by the shift hours. In the default case 11 trucks deliver 176.0 moves per hour against a required 175.0, so the fleet keeps up.

How does travel distance change the answer?

Travel distance changes fleet size through cycle time, and it is the biggest single lever on the result. A longer haul to a far mezzanine or a distant dock lengthens the round trip, which raises the truck-minutes of work for the same number of moves. In the default case, pushing the cycle time from 3 to 4 minutes cuts each truck to 12 moves per hour instead of 16 and raises the theoretical fleet to 14.58, so the base jumps from 11 to 15 trucks. One extra minute of cycle time added four trucks. This is why layout and slotting decisions that shorten travel pay back directly in a smaller fleet, and why cycle time should be measured on the actual routes rather than assumed.

What is the difference between forklifts and AGVs for sizing?

The formula is identical, because it depends on moves, cycle time, and available time, not on whether a person drives. What changes is the value of the inputs. An automated guided vehicle usually travels a fixed path at a steady, conservative speed, so its cycle time is often longer than a skilled operator’s on the same route, but far more consistent from move to move. Its utilization also shifts: an AGV can run through breaks and shift changes, which lifts the share of the day it works, but it stops on a fixed schedule to charge and cannot improvise around a blocked aisle. To size an AGV fleet, change the cycle time and the utilization to match the vehicle and leave the formula alone.

How do single and multiple shifts change the answer?

The formula sizes one shift at a time, so run it per shift with that shift’s own move count, cycle time, and utilization. Shifts rarely carry the same load: an evening shift may make fewer moves than a day shift, so it needs fewer trucks, though the fleet you own is usually set by the busiest shift. Utilization can also differ, since a night shift with thin demand often runs a lower productive share. Multiple shifts do let you spread a fixed fleet across more hours, which can shrink the number of trucks owned relative to running everything in one shift, but each shift still has to pass its own division and throughput check on the trucks available to it.

How do you find the tonnage moved per shift?

Multiply the moves per shift by the load carried on each move. In the default case, 1,400 moves at 800 kg each is 1,120,000 kg, which is 1,120.0 t per shift. The load per move is an optional input, so leaving it blank does not change the fleet size, it only removes the tonnage line. Tonnage does not drive the fleet math, but it is a useful cross-check: if the site ships a known weight per day, the tonnage the fleet handles should line up, and a large gap points to a miscounted move figure. It also feeds capacity planning for docks, racking, and staging, which size to weight as well as to pallet count.

What does this tool not include?

It sizes from average demand and a single cycle time, so it deliberately leaves out several real-world effects. It does not model the peak-hour profile, so a fleet sized to the shift average can still fall behind during the busiest hour. It does not model congestion and interference between trucks sharing narrow aisles, which lengthens cycle times as the fleet grows. It treats every move as the same job, so it does not separate putaway from picking or account for dual-cycle trips that combine both, and it does not model shift patterns in detail. Because of those limits, treat the output as a strong planning estimate: validate peak hours and travel distances, and simulate a large fleet before signing a lease.

Can this calculator size a mixed forklift and AGV fleet?

Yes, by running it once per vehicle type with the share of moves each type handles. Because the formula is vehicle-neutral, you can split the shift’s moves between manned trucks and automated units, then size each pool with its own cycle time and utilization: a longer, steadier cycle and a higher run-time share for the AGVs, and the measured floor figures for the forklifts. Add the two recommended fleets to get the mixed total. This is also the way to test an automation case, since holding the moves fixed and swapping the two inputs shows how many AGVs replace how many trucks. For a large mixed fleet, confirm the result with a simulation, since congestion between the two vehicle types is not captured by the division.

Sources, disclaimer, and editorial transparency

The work-based sizing formula, the utilization planning range, the spare-capacity margin, and the throughput cross-check described here follow recognized material-handling and operations sources, including practitioner guidance on how many forklifts an operation needs from Thompson Lift Truck, right-sizing and utilization guidance from Midco, and general fleet-utilization references on measuring productive versus paid hours. Fleet size is computed as truck-minutes of work divided by productive minutes per truck, rounded up, with a spare margin added for charging, maintenance, and breakdowns. This calculator and guide are built and reviewed by the OpsCalculators team; see our Editorial Policy for how each tool is researched, built, and tested.

Results are accurate estimates for planning and education, not a substitute for a full simulation or a site study. The method sizes from average demand and one cycle time, and it ignores the peak-hour profile, aisle congestion and interference between trucks, mixed task types, and detailed shift patterns, so a fleet that works on paper can still fall behind at the busiest hour. Validate peak hours and travel distances, and simulate a large fleet before a lease or capital decision. See our full Disclaimer. OpsCalculators.com is operated by MAFHH INTERNATIONAL LTD. Your inputs are processed in your browser and are never stored; see our Privacy Policy.